Behavioural Genetics

Behavioural genetics uses quantitative genetic methods to decompose the variance in psychological traits into components attributable to genetic differences between individuals, shared environmental influences (aspects of the environment that make family members similar to one another), and non-shared environmental influences (aspects that make family members different). Its central question is not whether genes matter — they always do — but how much of the observed variation in a trait in a particular population at a particular time is attributable to genetic versus environmental differences.

The twin method is the cornerstone of behavioural genetics research. Monozygotic (MZ) twins are genetically identical (~100% shared alleles); dizygotic (DZ) twins share on average ~50% of their alleles, like ordinary siblings. Under the classical twin model (ACE), if MZ twins are substantially more similar on a trait than DZ twins, genetic factors contribute to that trait. The difference 2(rMZ – rDZ) estimates narrow-sense heritability (h²). If MZ and DZ twins are similarly concordant, shared environment dominates. If MZ twins are not perfectly concordant, non-shared environment (plus measurement error) must explain the residual.

The adoption method provides a second line of evidence: children raised apart from biological parents share genes but not environment with their biological families, and environment but not genes with adoptive families. Adoption studies confirm and refine heritability estimates, and allow direct estimation of the shared environment component by comparing biological vs adoptive sibling correlations.

Eric Turkheimer's "three laws of behavioural genetics" (2000) summarise the field's most replicated findings: (1) All human behavioural traits are heritable. (2) The effect of being raised in the same family is smaller than the effect of genes. (3) A substantial portion of the variation in complex human behavioural traits is not accounted for by either genes or families. This third law points to non-shared environment — the environmental experiences unique to each individual within a family (peer groups, chance events, unique life experiences, intrauterine variation for MZ twins) — as the major measurable source of environmental influence on personality and psychopathology. The finding that shared environment contributes little to adult personality was surprising and remains controversial, but has been replicated repeatedly across diverse traits and samples.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is heritability and what does it not mean?

Heritability (h²) is the proportion of observed variance in a trait in a specific population that is attributable to genetic differences between individuals. It ranges from 0 (no genetic contribution to variance) to 1 (all variance is genetic). Critically, heritability is a population statistic, not a property of individuals: it says nothing about how much of any particular person's trait is "due to genes." It is also specific to a population and an environment: heritability of height is ~90% in rich countries (where nutrition is uniform, so most variation is genetic) but lower where nutrition varies dramatically. A highly heritable trait is not immutable: reading ability is substantially heritable, but literacy rates have been transformed by universal education. Heritability does not imply genetic determinism.

What is the non-shared environment and why does it matter?

Non-shared environment (E) refers to environmental factors that make siblings reared together different from one another — as opposed to shared environment (C), which makes them similar. In most personality and psychopathology measures, E accounts for a very large fraction of variance, often equal to or greater than heritability. Sources of non-shared environment include: differential peer group experiences, birth order effects (though often modest), unique life events, idiosyncratic treatment by parents (they don't treat all children identically), intrauterine variation (MZ twins share a womb but may differ in placentation), and random developmental noise. E in twin studies also includes measurement error, which is why twin-study E estimates are overestimates of true environmental non-sharing. Identifying specific non-shared environmental variables that reliably predict trait variance has proven difficult.

What do twin studies tell us about intelligence?

Intelligence is one of the most-studied traits in behavioural genetics. MZ twin correlations for IQ are approximately 0.85; DZ correlations approximately 0.60; adopted siblings converge toward zero correlation by adulthood. Heritability estimates for general intelligence in adulthood consistently cluster around 60–80% in Western samples — and, remarkably, heritability increases from childhood (~40%) to adulthood (~60–80%), while shared environmental effects decrease. Plomin and colleagues argue this reflects gene-environment correlation: as children grow older and gain autonomy, they increasingly select and create environments that fit their genetic propensities — "the child creates their own environment." Shared environment matters more in childhood (when parents control the environment) and for children raised in poverty.

What is the "missing heritability" problem?

Twin and adoption studies indicate that complex psychological traits like intelligence, personality, and schizophrenia are 50–80% heritable. Modern genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identifying common genetic variants (SNPs) explain only a small fraction of this estimated heritability — often < 20%. This gap is "missing heritability." Several explanations are debated: rare variants not captured by GWAS; gene-gene interactions (epistasis); gene-environment interactions; epigenetic mechanisms; overestimated twin heritability due to violated assumptions (e.g., assortative mating, gene-environment covariance); and the statistical challenge of aggregating many small genetic effects. Polygenic scores — summing thousands of SNP effects — now explain ~10–15% of IQ variance in population samples, a substantial improvement but still far short of heritability estimates.

Practice Questions

10 questions from across Cognitive Connie that test your understanding of behavioural genetics. Drawn from the complete question bank using the concept relationship — not only from one quiz.

Start practice quiz

Studies & Cases

Related Quizzes

Subjects & Related Concepts

Sources

Last reviewed: 8 August 2026

  1. 1.

    Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., Knopik, V. S., & Neiderhiser, J. M. (2016). Top 10 replicated findings from behavioural genetics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(1), 3–23.

    Review article

    Concise summary of the 10 most robustly replicated findings in behavioural genetics across five decades of research.

  2. 2.

    Turkheimer, E. (2000). Three laws of behavior genetics and what they mean. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(5), 160–164.

    Primary study

    Proposes the three laws of behavioural genetics based on meta-analytic patterns across the field.

  3. 3.

    Bouchard, T. J., Lykken, D. T., McGue, M., Segal, N. L., & Tellegen, A. (1990). Sources of human psychological differences: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart. Science, 250(4978), 223–228.

    Primary study

    Minnesota Twin Study of MZ twins reared apart — shows high heritability for personality and intelligence even without shared environment.

  4. 4.

    Falconer, D. S., & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics (4th ed.). Longman.

    Textbook

    Standard quantitative genetics textbook covering heritability, ACE decomposition, twin and adoption study methodology.