What is anger?

Anger is unique among the negative emotions: it is the only one associated with approach motivation rather than withdrawal. While fear motivates avoidance and sadness motivates disengagement, anger energises the organism toward the source of frustration or injustice. This makes it simultaneously adaptive — it can mobilise action to correct wrongs, defend against threats, and assert boundaries — and destructive, when it is excessive, misdirected, or expressed through aggression.

01

Appraisal of injustice

Anger is triggered when a situation is appraised as wrong, unfair, or blameworthy — someone or something is held responsible for an aversive outcome. The appraisal of agency is what distinguishes anger from sadness.

02

Approach motivation

Unlike other negative emotions, anger is associated with approach motivation — increased tendency to move toward and engage with the source of frustration. This gives anger its mobilising, sometimes constructive function.

03

Frustration-aggression hypothesis

Dollard and Miller's 1939 proposal that frustration always produces aggression and aggression is always caused by frustration. Berkowitz later revised this to a more nuanced cognitive-neoassociationistic model.

04

Catharsis is a myth

Expressing anger aggressively — punching a pillow, venting — does not reduce anger; it typically maintains or increases it. Catharsis theory has no empirical support and venting is counterproductive.

John Dollard & Neal Miller

1900–1980 / 1909–2002

Psychologists at Yale who formulated the frustration-aggression hypothesis (1939) — the first systematic attempt to link a specific emotional state to a specific behaviour. Though the absolute version of the hypothesis was too strong, it generated decades of productive research on the conditions under which frustration leads to aggression.

Leonard Berkowitz

1926–2016

Social psychologist who revised frustration-aggression theory into the cognitive neoassociation model and demonstrated the "weapons effect" — that the mere presence of weapons increased aggression in frustrated participants. His work shifted the field from simple frustration-aggression linkage to a more nuanced cognitive-emotional account.

Nico Frijda

1927–2015

Dutch psychologist whose work on emotion and action tendencies distinguished anger's motivational signature — readiness to confront — from other negative emotions. His appraisal analysis of anger, centred on norm violation and agency attribution, is foundational in the field.

Brad Bushman

1960–present

Social psychologist who has produced the most rigorous empirical refutations of catharsis theory, demonstrating across multiple paradigms that venting anger maintains or increases rather than reduces aggressive behaviour and feelings.

Appraisal theory of anger

Anger arises from the appraisal that an aversive event was caused by an agent (person or institution) who acted wrongly, unfairly, or illegitimately. Three key appraisal dimensions drive anger: goal-relevance (the event matters to the person's goals), agency (someone is responsible), and norm-violation (the agent acted wrongly). Without the attribution of blame, the same outcome produces sadness rather than anger.

Frustration-aggression hypothesis

Proposed by Dollard, Miller and colleagues (1939): frustration — the blocking of a goal-directed response — always leads to aggression, and all aggression is caused by frustration. The original hypothesis was too absolute; Leonard Berkowitz revised it (1989) to state that frustration produces anger, which can but need not lead to aggression, especially when situational cues prime aggressive cognition.

Cognitive neoassociation model

Berkowitz's revision of frustration-aggression theory. Aversive events — frustration, pain, heat, noise — generate negative affect that automatically activates a network of anger-related cognitions, behaviours, and physiological responses. Hostile cues in the environment (weapons, aggressive language) can activate this network even without direct frustration, explaining the "weapons effect."

Anger expression styles

Research distinguishes three styles: Anger-Out (expressing anger outwardly, toward people or objects), Anger-In (suppressing or holding anger inward), and Anger-Control (actively controlling anger before or after it occurs). Chronic anger-out and anger-in are both associated with elevated cardiovascular risk; anger-control is the most adaptive pattern.

Approach motivation

Anger is associated with left frontal EEG asymmetry — the same asymmetry associated with approach motivation and positive affect. This distinguishes anger from fear, disgust, and sadness (all right-frontal). Angry people show increased tendency to approach the source of their frustration, sometimes leading to constructive confrontation and sometimes to aggression.

Catharsis hypothesis

The Freudian idea that "releasing" or expressing aggression reduces arousal and anger — like releasing steam from a pressure cooker. Empirical research consistently shows the opposite: venting anger (through physical aggression, yelling, or even aggressive imagery) maintains or increases anger rather than reducing it. Brad Bushman's work has been especially systematic in disconfirming catharsis.

Hostile attribution bias

The tendency to interpret ambiguous social behaviours as hostile or threatening. Individuals high in trait aggression show a systematic bias toward attributing hostile intent to others in ambiguous situations. This cognitive distortion feeds anger and aggression cycles, and is a key target in interventions for conduct problems and chronic anger.

Displaced aggression

The redirection of aggression from its original source (which may be unavailable, too powerful, or socially inappropriate to attack) to an innocent substitute target. A person frustrated at work who comes home and snaps at family members is showing displaced aggression. Rumination about the original trigger increases the likelihood of displacement.

What triggers anger according to appraisal theory?+

Anger is triggered by the appraisal that an aversive situation was caused by an agent (person or institution) who acted wrongly, unfairly, or against legitimate expectations. The critical elements are goal-blocking, attribution of agency, and perceived norm-violation or blame. The same goal-blocking situation produces sadness if no agent is held responsible, or anxiety if the threat is still anticipated rather than attributed.

Is expressing anger cathartic?+

No — the catharsis hypothesis has no empirical support. Research consistently shows that expressing anger aggressively (venting, physical activity intended to "release" anger, aggressive imagery) maintains or increases anger rather than reducing it. It may also prime aggressive cognition. The most effective anger regulation strategies involve reappraisal (changing the meaning of the triggering event), problem-solving, and distraction — not venting.

What is the frustration-aggression hypothesis?+

Dollard, Miller and colleagues (1939) proposed that frustration — the blocking of goal-directed behaviour — always produces some form of aggression, and aggression is always caused by prior frustration. The original "always" version was revised by Berkowitz: frustration produces anger, not aggression directly, and aggression depends on the presence of aggressive cues and the absence of inhibitory factors. Current models treat frustration as one of many aversive experiences that can generate anger.

How does anger differ from aggression?+

Anger is an emotional state — a subjective feeling, with associated physiological arousal and appraisals of injustice. Aggression is a behaviour — intentional harm toward another person or object. The two are correlated but dissociable: most angry people do not act aggressively (inhibition, social norms, and cognitive control intervene), and aggression can occur without anger (instrumental aggression for material gain, for example). Effective anger management targets the emotion and its appraisals, not just behaviour.

Last reviewed July 2025
  1. 1.

    Averill, J. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38(11), 1145–1160. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.38.11.1145

    +About this source

    Empirical study of everyday anger revealing its social and constructive functions and the appraisal of injustice as the core trigger.

  2. 2.

    Berkowitz, L. (1990). On the formation and regulation of anger and aggression: A cognitive-neoassociationistic analysis. American Psychologist, 45(4), 494–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.4.494

    +About this source

    Berkowitz's revision of frustration-aggression theory into the cognitive neoassociation model including the weapons effect.

  3. 3.

    Dollard, J., Miller, N. E., Doob, L. W., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and Aggression. Yale University Press.

    +About this source

    Original frustration-aggression hypothesis proposing that frustration always produces aggression and aggression is always caused by frustration.